Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarina Valentina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 12:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarina Valentina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:ENT, insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Evil saltine (talk) 05:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PEOPLE per WP:TOOSOON (if ever at all). No WP:RS coverage. Singular career. Found only in SPS, forums, and blogs. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 01:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarina's worked with a number of big names (some that have their own entries) and has a dvd out. Most of the changes from the other day was from her fans after she call attention to the notices on her twitter account. --Freddboxx (talk) 01:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at WP:TOOSOON. Twitter, Facebook, and other forums and blogs do not do much for notability, if anything. And working with other notable people does not loan any notability itself. Having a DVD might help, but only if it and Sarina's career have received critical commentary in reliable sources. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet PORNBIO nor the GNG. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.